The Evangelical Cancer

Oh Billy

This interview would be funny if it weren’t so damn scary and sad. It certainly confirms my theory that life is simply to short to argue with any flavor of a Trump supporter.

Jerry Falwell Jr. can’t imagine Trump ‘doing anything that’s not good for the country’-  Joe Heim, The Washington Post

Jerry Falwell Jr., 56, took over as president of Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, in 2007, following the death of his father, the Rev. Jerry Falwell, who founded the school. He lives with his wife, Becki, in Bedford County, Virginia.

Q: You said recently that conservatives and Christians should stop electing nice guys. Aren’t Christians supposed to be nice guys?

A: Of course, of course. But that’s where people get confused. I almost laugh out loud when I hear Democrats saying things like, “Jesus said suffer the little children to come unto me” and try to use that as the reason we should open up our borders.

It’s such a distortion of the teachings of Jesus to say that what he taught us to do personally – to love our neighbors as ourselves, help the poor – can somehow be imputed on a nation. Jesus never told Caesar how to run Rome. He went out of his way to say that’s the earthly kingdom, I’m about the heavenly kingdom and I’m here to teach you how to treat others, how to help others, but when it comes to serving your country, you render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s. It’s a distortion of the teaching of Christ to say Jesus taught love and forgiveness and therefore the United States as a nation should be loving and forgiving, and just hand over everything we have to every other part of the world. That’s not what Jesus taught. You almost have to believe that this is a theocracy to think that way, to think that public policy should be dictated by the teachings of Jesus.

Q: So, the government you want is one free of religious association?

A: Yes. The government should be led by somebody who is going to do what’s in the best interest of the government and its people. And I believe that’s what Jesus thought, too.

Q: In 2016 you wrote in a Washington Post editorial that voters in the 2010 and 2014 midterms sent a message they were “tired of the leftist agenda.” What message did voters in the 2018 midterms send?

A: This midterm, the president did better than the average president does in his first midterms. So I think the message is that the American people are happy with the direction the country is headed and happy with the economy, happy with our newfound respect in the world. It’s a better result than you normally see in the first midterms.

Q: You pushed for national leaders to use the term “radical Islamic terrorism” when describing Muslims who are terrorists. Should leaders call it “white supremacist terrorism” when we have violent acts by white supremacists in this country?

A: Sure, if a terrorist is someone who is trying to overthrow a political regime. I guess it depends on what your definition of terrorism is. Anybody who kills anybody else or commits violence against anybody else because of their race is horrible. It’s just as bad as the 9/11 attack.

Q: You and other white evangelical leaders have strongly supported President Donald Trump. What about him exemplifies Christianity and earns him your support?

A: What earns him my support is his business acumen. Our country was so deep in debt and so mismanaged by career politicians that we needed someone who was not a career politician, but someone who’d been successful in business to run the country like a business. That’s the reason I supported him.

Q: The deficit and debt have increased during his first two years.

A: Yeah, Congress, the spending bill that they forced on him in order to get the military spending up to where it needed to be – he said that would be the last time he signed one of those. But he had no choice because (President Barack) Obama had decimated the military, and it had to be rebuilt.

Q: Is there anything President Trump could do that would endanger that support from you or other evangelical leaders?

A: No.

Q: That’s the shortest answer we’ve had so far.

A: Only because I know that he only wants what’s best for this country, and I know anything he does, it may not be ideologically “conservative,” but it’s going to be what’s best for this country, and I can’t imagine him doing anything that’s not good for the country.

Q: Is it hypocritical for evangelical leaders to support a leader who has advocated violence and who has committed adultery and lies often? I understand that a person can be forgiven their sins, but should that person be leading the country?

A: When Jesus said we’re all sinners, he really meant all of us, everybody. I don’t think you can choose a president based on their personal behavior because even if you choose the one that you think is the most decent – let’s say you decide Mitt Romney. Nobody could be a more decent human being, better family man. But there might be things that he’s done that we just don’t know about. So you don’t choose a president based on how good they are; you choose a president based on what their policies are. That’s why I don’t think it’s hypocritical.

There’s two kingdoms. There’s the earthly kingdom and the heavenly kingdom. In the heavenly kingdom the responsibility is to treat others as you’d like to be treated. In the earthly kingdom, the responsibility is to choose leaders who will do what’s best for your country. Think about it. Why have Americans been able to do more to help people in need around the world than any other country in history? It’s because of free enterprise, freedom, ingenuity, entrepreneurism and wealth. A poor person never gave anyone a job. A poor person never gave anybody charity, not of any real volume. It’s just common sense to me.

Q: You’ve been criticized by some other evangelical leaders about your support for the president. They say you need to demand higher moral and ethical standards. You disagree with them on that?

A: It may be immoral for them not to support him, because he’s got African-American employment to record highs, Hispanic employment to record highs. They need to look at what the president did for the poor. A lot of the people who criticized me, because they had a hard time stomaching supporting someone who owned casinos and strip clubs or whatever, a lot them have come around and said, “Yeah, you were right.” Some of the most prominent evangelicals in the country have said, “Jerry, we thought you were crazy, but now we understand.”

About ends and beginnings blog

I am a frustrated writer and poet waiting to be discovered. A stand-up philosopher performing on a street corner near you. A Christian with questions but I don’t want to hear your answers. A Buddhist with a bumper sticker on my truck to prove it. A collector of quotes. A grower of lettuce. The Patron Saint of earthworms who name their children after me. A cyclist whose big ass strains the seams of his Lycra bibs. I am American by birth, Southern by the grace of God. My goal in life is to leave an imprint on the lives of the people I love not a footprint on the earth. I am a son, a husband, a father composed of 65%-Oxygen, 18%-Carbon, 10%-Hydrogen, 3%-Nitrogen, 3%-Diet Coke and 1%-Oreo.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to The Evangelical Cancer

  1. Falwell, Jr. like his father is an amoral scumbag. Jesus never said love they neighbor as thyself…..except for blacks, browns, gays, Hispanics, Muslims, non-believers, etcetera. The Falwell clan is trying to redefine the few truths that can be found in the Bible (and there aren’t many) to suit a white supremacist agenda. Good to see your name pop up on my screen, my friend. Happy New Year.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Nan says:

    Well, Jerry, count me in as one who doesn’t understand because I DO think you’re crazy!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. “Evangelical Cancer” is the perfect label.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Patty says:

    Happy New Year dear Mr. Legend !

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Swarn Gill says:

    He must be living in the 51st state. The state of Delusion. Wow.

    Liked by 1 person

      • Swarn Gill says:

        I have a little more time to respond now that I don’t have children awake and rambunctious.

        I wanted to know what your interpretation of Mark 21 was in regards to the “give Caesar what is Caesar’s”. Interestingly that verse has also been used to say that Christianity supports separation of Church and State. I would say that’s probably true to a certain extent, but when I read the chapter I come up with a couple of interpretations. It says quite clearly that the Pharisees are trying to trap him. Get him to openly denounce Caesar. Jesus sees through this and so his response could be simply to make sure they have no cause to arrest him. Alternately, and actually not mutually exclusive to the first interpretation Jesus is simply saying he is indifferent to the actions of Caesar, because he is only interested in creating God’s kingdom on Earth and to that end all that matters is how we treat each other. The actions of a nation state are irrelevant to what must ultimately occur if we are going to live in peace and harmony together. We all must take good morals to heart and act accordingly. This seems to be the essence of Jesus in the bible. He is against Roman oppression, but he is not openly political. He’s trying to raise the consciousness of the people, not directly overthrow the government. Either way Falwell seems completely dishonest here. And one important point that he is missing is that Jesus, and the people of his time didn’t get to vote for Caesar. In a democracy, as a Christian who has participatory rights in that democracy a good Christian should be actually voting for a person with good morals. Even if one wanted to argue that Hillary Clinton was also morally suspect (and I think she hasn’t led the purest of lives) it would be the good Christian’s responsibility to either not vote or write in a candidate that Christians can agree on follows the teachings of Jesus Christ.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. maryplumbago says:

    Christian Evangeliclism and Fundamentalism are nothing more than a political party. It’s power and control and the people they dupe, which are many, are weak minded and not the brightest bulbs in the room.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. maryplumbago says:

    He is a corrupt power seeking greedy man.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. This is an old fashioned Gish gallop!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s